Who remembers that in our techstitute in July, perhaps ever so fleetingly, a conversation meandered toward the question "If one were to have a social networking site page, do professional adults use MySpace or Facebook?" In Virginia Heffernan's "The Medium: Coldpage," she comments, "... the university crowd may have quit the boisterous MySpace for the wittier and more austere Facebook" (The New York Times Magazine 13 July 2008 and here's the link to this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/magazine/13wwln-medium-t.html).
Searching, I also found a warning that posting too much personal data on a social networking site can offer identity thieves easier pickings, duh. I hadn't articulated that risk, but I've never been convinced sharing real names and details and photos (risque or not) with the vaposphere makes sense.
But back to MySpace v. Facebook, this explanation was offered in the Times Freakonomics blog (link: http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/myspace-v-facebook-the-class-divide/), which is followed by many comments:
- - - - - - -
June 27, 2007, 2:14 pm
MySpace v. Facebook: The Class Divide
By Melissa Lafsky
There’s been plenty of buzz this week over a paper by U.C. Berkeley PhD. student Danah Boyd, who argues that Facebook users are more socioeconomically advantaged than those on MySpace. According to Boyd, the Facebook crowd “tend[s] to come from families who emphasize education and going to college … They are primarily white, but not exclusively. They are in honors classes, looking forward to the prom, and live in a world dictated by after school activities.”
This conclusion isn’t too surprising given the evolution paths of the two sites. MySpace, launched in 2003 as a competitor to the then-dominant Friendster, built its popularity on the ability to post music files on individual profiles. It emerged in 2005 as the preeminent social networking site, and developed popularity as a means of self-promotion for careers ranging from adult film star to presidential candidate.
Facebook, meanwhile, was created in 2004 by an undergraduate at Harvard, and evolved as an invite-only site for college students. In 2006, when MySpace was boasting 46 million users a month to Facebook’s 9.3 million, the smaller site opened its doors to include all potential users (to some protests from its core market of undergrads, recent alums, and teens preparing for college). Only in the past few months has the network begun to creep up on MySpace in popularity and growth. As such, logic decrees that Facebook would emerge as the more academically-oriented of the two, with a greater draw for upwardly mobile teens headed for college — a disproportionate number of whom are also white and come from wealthier backgrounds. And that, it seems, is an issue far more worthy of study.
- - - - - - -
So I'm not in any hurry to create a Facebook page, for reasons above and many others (the complete Toni Morrison, painting the house, riding my bike, etc.) or investigate if a LinkedIn ("the world's largest business network") page is necessary, but until these sites are completely replaced by the next big new* thing, and they no doubt will be any day now, here's a partial answer to one of life's persistent questions, Guy Noir, for whatever it's worth.
_________
* Or "old" thing--today's Times reported that Google's Friendster site is heavily used, and getting a new $20 million investment, in Asia (Stone, Brad. "BITS: Friendster Lives: New Cash, New C.E.O. and a New Strategy?" New York Times 5 Aug. 2008: 12:38 a.m. accessed 5 Aug. 2008 and here's the link: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/05/friendster-lives-new-cash-new-ceo-and-a-new-strategy/index.html?ref=technology).
Tags:
Share
You need to be a member of NYCWP Voices to add comments!
Join this Ning Network